Does your breeding
program have a destination, or does it simply have a direction?
Most ranchers have no specific target to shoot for. They have
a direction, but they have no destination. They are moving, but
they don’t know where they are going. If you don’t
know where you are going, how are you going to know when you
get there? Once you have reached your destination or goal, you
should try to maintain that level without going any further.
Direction. A breeding program that
has a direction, but no destination, would constantly be trying
to
increase or
decrease
one or more traits. For example,
it would increase a 350 pound weaning weight to 400 pounds, and increase that
to 500 pounds, and increase that to 600 pounds, and on and on. That first 50
pounds might be easy to achieve, but every increase after that will become more
and more difficult and expensive. For every dollar invested you will receive
less and less in return. When you go beyond your optimum level, your net profits
will actually begin to decrease. I know several ranchers who have finally concluded
that their optimum (most profitable) weaning weight is only 400 to 450 pounds.
Remember, you can’t get something for
nothing. Every increase in production comes with a cost. It’s ironic,
but several ranches that were paid for with 350 pound calves are going
broke
with 600
pound
calves.
What went wrong?
For forty years producers have successfully
increased growth and size in their cattle, and most are still running in
the same
direction.
Seedstock
producers are leading the pack. They are willing to do whatever it takes
to continue increasing their weaning and yearling weights. But what happens
when they go beyond the optimum level? Feed costs will increase along with
cow size. Calving problems will increase along with birth weights. Herd
fertility and efficiency will suffer. But most importantly, net profits
will decrease. This may go unnoticed by seedstock producers who are able
to sell their bull calves to commercial producers at an over-inflated price,
but what about the commercial producer who buys and uses these bulls? How
will these bulls affect his profitability?
As ranchers, we’ve been conditioned to
believe that our progress can only be measured by the visible changes that
occur
in
our
cattle. It’s
difficult for us to stop at the optimum level for any trait because there
would be no more visible change. Since we can no longer see an improvement,
we feel compelled to keep pushing on in the same direction. Direction is
good, but only if we have a destination in mind.
Destination. A producer who has a destination knows what it takes to maximize
profits. He knows what size and type of cow is optimum for his environment.
He knows what his optimum level is for birth weight, growth, milk, etc. All
of his breeding decisions are made with his destination in mind.
He realizes there are genetic antagonisms between
several of the important economic traits in beef cattle. For example, extreme
growth
rate
will negatively
affect calving ease, fertility, and feed requirements for maintenance.
There are trade-offs that must be considered when making breeding decisions.
We can only select for so much growth, muscle and milk without having some
negative consequences. Therefore, the optimum level for many traits lies
somewhere in the middle. All the flashy extremes that everyone is drooling
over must be avoided. It’s unfortunate, but most seedstock producers
don’t seem to have the discipline required to quit using the extremes.
Once you’ve reached your destination you
can start working on uniformity within your herd. This isn’t difficult
if you know what your optimum levels are for all the traits you select
for. There
is
absolutely no reason
you cannot reduce the variations that exist for birth weight, weaning weight,
yearling weight, cow size, fleshing ability, etc., within your herd. To
do so, though, requires that you know exactly where you are going. Your
breeding program must have more than just a direction. You will need a
destination.