| Printable
Ultrasound Data . . . |
The
live animal carcass ultrasound used by Dr. Allen Williams and Clay
Nash (both
of Tallgrass
Beef)
is an
automated, chute-side software system that captures images and
calculates trait measurements on an objective basis. The traits
determined by
this ultrasound software are: |
- Back Fat Thickness
- Ribeye Shape Score
- Ribeye Area (REA)
|
- Ribeye Area/Hundred Weight (REA/CWT)
- Percent Intramuscular
Fat Ratio (% IMF RATIO)
- Tenderness Score
|
|
| On this and the
following six pages (in .pdf format), we have posted these measurements
and scores (except Ribeye
Area)
for
all of the bulls in this sale — by lot number. Dr. Williams
considers the Ribeye Shape Score and the Tenderness Score to be the
two most important traits because they are not affected much by environment
or by the amount of feed consumed by the animal. In other words,
these scores should be about the same whether the animal is being
fed a hot feedlot ration or grazing poor quality forages with no
supplement. Dr. Williams provided brief descriptions of these two
traits below. |
| Ribeye
Shape Score: This score is indicative of desired shape of the ribeye muscle.
It
is
correlated
to eventual
Yield Grade, Cutability, and % Retail Product. The score ranges from
0.0 to 1.0, with an acceptable score being 0.35 or greater. An ideal
score is 0.50 or greater. |
| Tenderness
Score: This score is correlated to the actual Warner-Bratzler Shear Force
in
a carcass
ribeye steak
at the 12th rib location. This score ranges from 10-50, with 10 being
very tender, 20 being tender, 30 being slightly tender, 40 being
slightly tough, and 50 being tough. An ideal score for heifers and
steers is 25 or less, but 29 or less is considered acceptable in
bulls. |
| Back Fat and Percent
Intramuscular Fat are affected by environment and feed consumption.
It is easy
to see
that these bulls were being nutritionally stressed by our forage
test. The fact that these bulls were being run in 10 different groups
is also somewhat evident by the amount of variation that exists for
fat thickness and marbling. With all this in mind, we asked Dr. Williams
to shade in the scores and measurements that he would consider to
be “top-sort”. I hope you find this data interesting
and useful. |
|
The ultrasound data is now in a convenient pdf form that
you can download and take with you (if needed). Simply click the
link below to open the ultrasound data file. You can then save
it to your computer or just print it out for easy viewing. This
file
includes pages 97-104 of the Spring Bull Sale catalog.
|
|
|
(The Next button
will take you to page 92 of the Catalog) |